page under construction

page under construction

Remember that you are not just not complying with a standard you are breaking a law in using eliminators that do not comply with the latest standard, so the unsuspecting purchaser needs to be careful.

We have heard that some unscrupulous suppliers are copying Brentwood test data and using this to sell inferior copies of the Brentwood eliminators. If you have any doubts contact Brentwood direct and ask them about the supplier from whom you intend to purchase eliminators. If Brentwood has not issued their test results to that supplier they can tell you that you are about to purchase trouble.

If the performance of the PVC fill and eliminator components are not correct how much can you trust that cheap suppliers statement about compliance to PVC material CTI STD-136?

We should point out at this point that Brentwood have the most efficient eliminators available today and like the statement on performance Brentwood also issue their compliance with CTI STD-136.

Their CF Ultra eliminators have been independently tested using the HBIK method to have a drift rate of between 0.0004% and 0.00025% drift.

I think the closest competitor to that has independent test results at almost 3 times this drift rate and yet proudly advertises this result.

It is up to the purchaser of the eliminators to ensure they are fit for purpose but if you are buying the “second best protection” to me it is not very reassuring and legally, if you use second best, have you fulfilled your obligations to the public?

Another reason for choosing the Brentwood product.

It works and it has been proven to be vastly superior to other eliminators.

You could view eliminators as your last line of defence but with the price of water rising it is also a cost saving measure.